Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
A man prays at a memorial at the scene of the shooting at Tops supermarket in Buffalo, New York.
A man prays at a memorial at the scene of the shooting at Tops supermarket in Buffalo, New York. Photograph: Brendan McDermid/Reuters
A man prays at a memorial at the scene of the shooting at Tops supermarket in Buffalo, New York. Photograph: Brendan McDermid/Reuters

Meta, Amazon, Google played a part in radicalizing Buffalo shooter, suit alleges

This article is more than 10 months old

The suit, filed by victim’s relatives, says big tech bears responsibility for exposing the gunman to racist content

Tech and social media giants such as Facebook, Amazon and Google bear responsibility for radicalizing the Buffalo supermarket shooter, who was fueled by racist conspiracy theories he encountered online, the victim’s relatives said in a lawsuit filed on Wednesday.

“They were the conspirators, even if they don’t want to admit it,” the civil rights attorney Ben Crump said at a news conference announcing the lawsuit, which seeks unspecified financial damages as well as changes in how the companies operate.

The suit names several online platforms including Facebook’s parent company Meta, Instagram, Google, Discord and Amazon – which owns Twitch, the livestreaming platform the shooter used to broadcast last year’s violence. The suit also names RMA Armament, the maker of the gunman’s body armor, as well as the firearms retailers that sold him weapons.

Ten people were killed, all of them Black and three others were wounded in May 2022 when Payton Gendron opened fire at the Tops Friendly Market in a predominantly Black neighborhood of Buffalo, New York. Gendron, who was 18 years old at the time, targeted the neighborhood after conducting research online and drove 200 miles (322km) from his home in Conklin, New York.

He is serving a sentence of life in prison without parole after pleading guilty to crimes including murder and domestic terrorism motivated by hate.

The lawsuit says Gendron admits he became addicted to social media and was “lured, unsuspectingly, into a psychological vortex by defective social media applications and fed a steady stream of racist and white supremacist propaganda and falsehoods”.

The mother of Zaire Goodman, who was shot in the neck and survived, described being “tagged” in a video that circulated widely online after Gendron livestreamed his rampage using a camera attached to the helmet he wore.

Mourners light candles at a makeshift memorial outside of Tops market after the shooting. Photograph: Scott Olson/Getty Images

“No one should be looking at that,” said Zeneta Everhart, Goodman’s mother.

Twenty-two users watched the violence in real time on Gendron’s Twitch account, which was simultaneously broadcast on his Discord account, according to the lawsuit.

Just before the shooting, the gunman also made public 700 pages of an online diary detailing his plans and linked to a Google document containing a self-described “manifesto” describing his racist motivations, the lawsuit said.

In response to the lawsuit, a spokesperson for YouTube, which is owned by Google, said the company has invested in technology and policies to identify and remove extremist content.

“We regularly work with law enforcement, other platforms, and civil society to share intelligence and best practices,” José Castañeda said in a statement.

Kimberly Salter, whose husband, Aaron Salter, was the store’s security guard, said at a news conference on Wednesday: “These are human beings’ lives that were taken by a murderer.”

Aaron Salter, a retired police officer, was fatally shot after a bullet he fired struck Gendron but was deflected by body armor, authorities said.

The body armor’s manufacturer, RMA Armament, said the lawsuit comes as a surprise and that its “products are intended for the protection of law-abiding private citizens, police departments and government partners”.

Other companies named in the suit did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Terrence Connors, a Buffalo attorney who along with Crump represents the families, said the legal team had thoroughly examined “the entire line of the gun distribution, the manufacturers of the body armor, the high-capacity magazines that are plainly illegal”, as well as social media platforms.

“What we found was downright scary,” he said.

The suit also names Gendron’s parents, Paul and Pamela Gendron, who the lawsuit claims armed their son despite warning signs that he was dangerous.

The Gendrons’ lawyer did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The lawsuit is similar to one filed in May by other victims’ of the shooting. Attorneys said the lawsuits may be combined.

“There were many people who helped him load that gun,” Crump said. “And it is our objective to make sure that everybody that loaded that gun is held to account.”

Most viewed

Most viewed